Tuesday, March 28, 2017

LOC 046 The Twelve Chosen

046 The Life of Christ: The Twelve Chosen

This morning we will look at the Jesus’ calling of the twelve disciples to be with him on a full time basis from the passages in Luke 6:12-16 & Mark 3:13-19.

Let’s read the text from Luke 6:

Luke 6:12 ¶ Now it came to pass in those days that He went out to the mountain to pray, and continued all night in prayer to God.  13 And when it was day, He called His disciples to Himself; and from them He chose twelve whom He also named apostles:  14 Simon, whom He also named Peter, and Andrew his brother; James and John; Philip and Bartholomew;  15 Matthew and Thomas; James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon called the Zealot;  16 Judas the son of James, and Judas Iscariot who also became a traitor.

We will consider the event under the following headings:

1. Careful Consideration:
2. Prayerful Consideration:
3. Deliberate Consideration:
4, Personal Consideration:

1. Careful Consideration:

The imagery is striking.  The Old Israel with her 12 tribes had continually forsaken God by breaking covenant with him through unfaithfulness and disobedience.  The Messiah comes. He is ministering to the multitudes of the descendants of this same Israel. He is rejected by the leadership. Yet, he needs a larger of band of men to learn from him in order to assume the leadership role that will be needed in less then two years.  Time is critical. These called disciples will learn and follow and work in ways the multitudes never would. These selected would become his intimate band of followers with whom he would spend much of his time and energies. Before choosing those who would be the new leaders among his people, Jesus takes some time away, it may have been a few or many days. 

Luke tells us, “Now it came to pass in those days” meaning somewhere in this time frame, around these other events, like the crowds pressing in around Jesus at the seashore. The phrase is a vague term that allows for an indefinite amount of time to go by. What we should note is the carefulness of Jesus as he goes about choosing the 12 disciples who would become the 12 apostles.  He doesn’t just line them up in some way, or pick them at random, or even ask those who are interested in joining his band of followers.  He gave this calling of them some thought. 

Have you ever thought to yourself, where did the twelve come from?  They don't just “POP” into the picture as disciples, they had to have some history with the Lord Jesus in order to be know to him as men with some potential to bring his purposes to pass.  From where did they come?

We have noted in earlier message that some of the disciples had already been called.  Simon Peter and Andrew were first taken as disciples in John 1:40-42 where .........

John 1:40 One of the two who heard John speak, and followed Him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother.  41 He first found his own brother Simon, and said to him,  “We have found the Messiah”  (which is translated, the Christ).  42 And he brought him to Jesus. Now when Jesus looked at him, He said,  “You are Simon the son of Jonah. You shall be called Cephas”  (which is translated, A Stone).

Note that Andrew is always Andrew but Peter is known by three names, Simon, Peter & Cephas (Kayphas in Aramaic). 

It is commonly believed that John the writer of the Gospel was the other of the two who were taken to be disciples as transfers from John’s ministry.

And then Peter and Andrew and James and John were called again by the Sea of Galilee a few months later.

Mark 1:16-17 ¶ And as He walked by the Sea of Galilee, He saw Simon and Andrew his brother casting a net into the sea; for they were fishermen.  17 Then Jesus said to them,  “Follow Me, and I will make you become fishers of men.”

John and James had been disciples of John the Baptist who became disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ when he called them by the Sea of Galilee, perhaps near where he was now teaching. 

Luke 5:10 and so also were James and John, the sons of Zebedee, who were partners with Simon. And Jesus said to Simon,  “Do not be afraid. From now on you will catch men.”  11 So when they had brought their boats to land, they forsook all and followed Him.

In their initial calling back in John 1, they introduced us to Philip and Nathaniel. 

John 1:43-4 ¶ The following day Jesus wanted to go to Galilee, and He found Philip and said to him,  “Follow Me.”  44 Now Philip was from Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.  45 Philip found Nathanael and said to him,  “We have found Him of whom Moses in the law, and also the prophets, wrote — Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”  46 And Nathanael said to him,  “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” Philip said to him,  “Come and see.”  47 Jesus saw Nathanael coming toward Him, and said of him,  “Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom is no deceit!”  48 Nathanael said to Him,  “How do You know me?” Jesus answered and said to him,  “Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you.”  49 Nathanael answered and said to Him,  “Rabbi, You are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!”

And, we looked for two weeks at the calling of Matthew, aka Levi, and the effects of his call from Tax Collector to Disciple.  At least seven of the men in this list have had previous history with Jesus and many of them had been travelling with him as his disciples.  So, in this narrative, we have Jesus making the final cut of those who would be his final 12 in whom he would pour himself as he trained them.

Note: The 12 were not with Jesus for 3 1/2 years.  They are called less than two years before the death and resurrection of Jesus. 

Note: seven of the twelve have already been revealed as his followers in one sense or another. That makes seven we already know something about.  This passage s not the only passage that tells us of Jesus calling of the disciples, it is one of many that give to us the full picture of the progressive nature of the calling of the twelve who were chosen.

But what of the others--where did the other five come from? Have you ever considered that question?

They were from among the multitudes that followed Jesus.  Remember, they have been pressing in against him to the point where he is almost crushed or pushed into the Sea.  These others were among those who followed the Lord Jesus Christ wherever he went.  They were among the multitudes who were there to be called.

2. Prayerful Consideration:

Luke 6:12b He went out to the mountain to pray, and continued all night in prayer to God.

Jesus gave careful consideration and prayerful consideration.

We do not know the content of his prayer to his Father in heaven.  We only know that he did pray before he made the final cut of who would be his intimate band of followers among the multitudes that constantly pressed him in.

Jesus went away from the masses once again.  This time he did not go to the wilderness, but he went to the mountain.

The NKJV makes this to be a specific though unnamed mountain. Rather than just out to “a mountain,” it is translated as “the mountain.” Perhaps the original audience was expected to know the topography and geography of Israel enough that there would be little question of where Jesus went. We are not so informed. 

Here is a large mountainous area about 10 miles west of the Sea of Galilee that goes up o over 3000 feet above sea level.  That certainly fits the criteria of mountain over against the usual word used for hill or hilly area.  From the Sea of Galilee that is at about 700 feet below sea level to the Mountains to the west we find a constant rise in elevation.  This large chunk of mountain is the likely place where Jesus went to isolate himself in order to pray.

The text already read said “in those days”, Jesus was likely gone for more than one day of travel, yet one night of concentrated activity in prayer.  The text says

Luke 6:13 and continued all night in prayer to God

Jesus gave himself over to prayer for an entire night in order to how his dependance upon his Father.  This was not a simple choice of any twelve available who might do the work, it was not a selection of twelve who might have a chance of succeeding in the job.  It was a careful, prayerful and deliberate attempt t do the will of God knowing the great wok they would have to continue upon his own death.  It was all important to the work of God and the spread of the Gospel.  These would be the twelve who would turn the world upside down, well, eleven of them would be.....

3. Deliberate Consideration:

When someone does something deliberately, that means they do it after careful consideration of all the factors involved.  This category might sound redundant, or unnecessary, but it is needed to make an important point. 

I find Christians in our day and age want to handle matters, even many weighty matters, in a quick and decisive manner.  The important decisions of life often take careful, prayerful, deliberative, thought before action is due.  We like the easy way out.  We want to deal with something in a quick spurt of thought and activity.  We don't like to wrestle with problems. We want to deal with them and move on to the next challenge, or thing we can ignore. 

When a judge challenges a jury before it decides or deliberates, he always tells them to consider the evidence and testimony before they make any hast and rash decisions.  When one decides on gut feeling and impulse alone, they are more likely to make poor choices and decisions than if they have given it careful and prayerful deliberation. Christians should be contemplative unto deliberate actions based on informed decisions, rather than compulsion and quick and easy choices that are to be repented of later on.

Harry is teaching the adult Sunday School class on the Spiritual disciplines.  At some point he will handle solitude as a spiritual act.  It was part of Jesus’ walk with his Father, should it be no less part of our’s?  If Jesus needed time alone with God in prayed before such an important decision, don't we too, who are so much weaker and misinformed and so tainted by sin? 

One of the great areas where this is a weakness is in the area of evangelism.  Evangelicalism does not want to allow people time to think over things of eternal weight and value. Yet, if we look at our own experiences in grace, we see that God used many things to woo us to himself.  We should not have confidence in our flesh to “win” others, but in the power of GOD working through his Word by the Spirit.  A man will not and can not understand the kingdom of God until and unless he is born again.  Dead men are brought to life, not by themselves and a choice, but by the work of God giving the gift of faith and the grant of repentance.  I don’t be offended or put off if people don't “Choose” what you offer.  God’s word does not return void.  It will accomplish either to bring the one to life or to confirm them in death.  Paul wrote about Christian ministers and their continual triumph in these words:

2 Cor. 2:14-16 Now thanks be to God who always leads us in triumph in Christ, and through us diffuses the fragrance of His knowledge in every place. 15 For we are to God the fragrance of Christ among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing.  16 To the one we are the aroma of death leading to death, and to the other the aroma of life leading to life. And who is sufficient for these things?

The answer is no mere man, only God and his work through men.

Many times when we are seeking guidance it is good to get someone else’s perspective after praying to God for wisdom from above.  Don't be so proud of your ability to sort things out that you don't pray about things, that you don't act in haste, or don’t deliberate with yourself and others.  Part of being Christ-like is to have a careful and prayerful dependence upon God for all things, including guidance.  And, seek it primarily on the pages of Scripture as you seek God’s principles to live by.

4. Personal Consideration:

He called His disciples to Himself.  It was a particular call to a specific task--to be his personal faithful disciples.

Jesus did not treat all the people who made up the multitudes in the same way.  That is an important truth to see.  In our world of democratic principles we believe that everyone has a right to whatever anyone else has.  That is not true.  There are some to whom leaders must give more time and effort than others.  Not all men are to be treated alike.  That is a myth of American Democratic ideals.  Every one needs to be treated according to the real need as time and energy allows.  There is a big difference.

Jesus knew who these people were and what they had to offer and how they would fulfill God’s eternal purposes and help accomplish this great work of God on behalf of man. These disciples had already been around Jesus: some for a year, others for months, and perhaps some for weeks.

Note the language in the verse is emphatic--He, that is Jesus, called, His Disciples to Himself. 

Jesus did the calling personally.
Jesus called them to the office of Disciple to follow.
Jesus called them to follow Himself. 
It was a very personal thing.  As the others already called had forsaken all to follow him, so would those who made the final cut.

Luke tells us Jesus called them to be his disciples, Mark tells us Jesus appointed them to be sent out (apostles).  The twin concepts or call and appoint give us a wonderful picture of what happened that day.  They were called to call to, with the expectation of a reciprocal relation — ‘to call, to call to.’ And, they were also appointed, they were caused to be in that position. The basic meaning of the word translated here appointed is to cause a state to be — ‘to cause to be, to make to be, to make, to result in, to bring upon, to bring, the particular context points to a more specific meaning of to cause someone to assume a particular type of function — ‘to assign to a task, to cause people to assume responsibilities for a task.

Note again, there was no appeal to a choice to be made by the disciples.  They had NO CHOICE in it at all.  It was all initiated by the Lord Jesus who calls and appoints these twelve to be his own disciples and the original language conveys a sense of ownership and authority by Jesus over the twelve. 

We are so influenced by humanism and decisionism that we want to make everything a willful choice of the individual.  To us that makes it meaningful.  So, we come to passages like this and we impose on the text what is not there.  Jesus did not offer an appeal for those twelve guys who thought they would like to give us a few years travel with Jesus as a travelling mission of so sort.  He sovereignly called them to the position of Disciple, that they might in the future e sent out to preach.  He was going to spend his energy training and teaching them in a way he would not teach and train the multitudes. 

Even in his sovereignty, they were willing because God had made them willing to forsake all to follow Christ.  When it is man’s choice, man can back out of it and make his profession false.  When it is God who truly calls one to be his disciple, leaving the call is of eternal consequence--apostasy, to be without standing, the position one had been called unto.  And, among the twelve, there was ne to be found. Discipleship is not about human choice, it is about divine call.  If called, you must, MUST, follow. 

To be his own intimate band of followers, he called:

1. Simon, to whom He gave the Aramaic name Cephas (Kayphas in its Greek pronunciation, though Cephas has ben the traditional pronunciation in the English peaking world) meaning Stone (in Greek Petros giving us...) Peter see John 1:42. Sometimes called Simon Peter together. The disciple with four names.   

2. James the son of Zebedee--one of two Jameses
3. John (the brother of James), --T writer of the Gospel who bears his name and the one whom Jesus loved.  Even among the disciples, there are special relationships.
(to James and John,  Jesus gave the name Boanerges, that is,  “Sons of Thunder”)

4. Andrew, brother of Simon Peter,

5. Philip,

6. Bartholomew, AKA Nathaniel

7. Matthew, aka Levi, the former Tax-collector

8. Thomas, aka Didymus, Doubting Thomas?

9. James the son of Alphaeus, the other James.

10. Thaddaeus, aka Leddaeus and Judas, the brother of the second James. (John 14:22), probably referring to the same person, speaks of “Judas, not Iscariot.” After the other Judas brought scandal upon himself and left the faith, a need rose to differentiate this Judas with the other.  These different names may designate the same person.  Some believe this Jude or Judas, was the author of the epistle Jude.

11. Simon, derived from Simeon, the Cananite; Also known as Simon the Zealot. One of the twelve apostles, called the Canaanite (Matt. 10:4; Mark 3:18). This word “Canaanite” does not always mean a native of the land of Canaan, but is derived from the Syriac word Kanean or Kaneniah, which was the name of a Jewish sect. The Revised Version has “Cananaean;” marg., “or Zealot” He is also called “Zelotes” (Luke 6:15; Acts 1:13; R.V., “the Zealot”), because previous to his call to the apostleship he had been a member of the fanatical sect of the Zealots. There is no record regarding him.

12. Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed Him.  What an epitaph to have!  Who also betrayed Jesus.....

He was a Son of a Simon (John 6:71; 13:2, 26), surnamed Iscariot, i.e., a man of Kerioth (Josh. 15:25). His name is uniformly the last in the list of the apostles, as given in the synoptic (i.e., the first three) Gospels. The evil of his nature probably gradually unfolded itself till “Satan entered into him” (John 13:27), and he betrayed our Lord (18:3). Afterwards he owned his sin with “an exceeding bitter cry,” and cast the money he had received as the wages of his iniquity down on the floor of the sanctuary, and “departed and went and hanged himself” (Matt. 27:5). He perished in his guilt, and “went unto his own place” (Acts 1:25). The statement in Acts 1:18 that he “fell headlong and burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out,” is in no way contrary to that in Matt. 27:5. The suicide first hanged himself, perhaps over the valley of Hinnom, “and the rope giving way, or the branch to which he hung breaking, he fell down headlong on his face, and was crushed and mangled on the rocky ground below.”

We should ask: Why was Judas Iscariot chosen to be an apostle?  We know not, but it is written that “Jesus knew from the beginning who should betray him” (John 6:64).

Jesus knew what he was doing. Even the choice of Judas was careful, prayerful, deliberate and personal. 

Nor can any answer be satisfactorily given to the question as to the human motives that led Judas to betray his Master. Crime is, for the most part, the result of a hundred motives rushing with bewildering fury through the mind of the criminal.”

What we do know is this, what Judas meant for evil and personal profit, God meant for good and great spiritual good. 

The Church often finds men of treachery within her walls. Yet God uses them for good, even when they intend evil.  I am here because of the treachery of one who denied the Scripture’s rightful place in the life of a Church.  God used that to bring about the circumstances that brought us here even as he brought about the circumstances that moved Pastor Jim along.  Out of evil and treachery, God can bring his ultimate good. 

As a point of application, let me ask, if someone found a copy of our role a few hundred years from now and went out t research you as individuals and us as a body of believers, what would they be compelled to write?

Would we be known as people who followed the Lord fully or that we were people of treachery?  Would we be known as those who followed for what we could get out of it, of for what we could put into it in response to God’s love and grace?  What would they be compelled to say about us?

More importantly, what would they say about our Lord and master Jesus based on how we have lived and what we have written?  Do we follow in his ways?  Do we show forth his grace?  Do we live in submission to his rule over his people? Do we live as if we had the right to chose what we want to do and not do? Or, do we follow in his ways?  It is only the latter that will have the godly effect of making men consider the wonders of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Who do you promote? Yourself and family, or the Lord Jesus Christ?  Whose agenda do you follow?  Whose law do you uphold?  Whose light directs your path?  These are important questions!  If we claim to be Jesus personal disciples whom he carefully and prayerfully and deliberately called, we should follow him in a way that will be evident to him and to those who watch us and know us that Jesus is our savior and Lord. 



No comments:

Post a Comment